| 1. | :Have you ever heard of an Argumentum ad populum?
|
| 2. | You said argumentum ad populum is not proof, so take your own advice.
|
| 3. | You are also using a logical fallacy of Argumentum ad populum over and over again.
|
| 4. | This is the logical fallacy Argumentum ad populum, and it makes you wrong yet again.
|
| 5. | :: But that is just the logical fallacy of " Argumentum ad populum ".
|
| 6. | However, this is an " argumentum ad populum ", and is not deductively valid.
|
| 7. | Argumentum ad populum, FTW ! ! ! Preceding contribs ) 03 : 59, 9 September 2008 ( UTC)
|
| 8. | The argumentum ad populum view that its validity is enhanced because many accepted it is a fallacy and should be simply discounted.
|
| 9. | Adding " some " or " most " as I want to isn't an argumentum ad populum by the above definition.
|
| 10. | You might want to read up on argumentum ad populum .-- talk ) 14 : 36, 8 April 2009 ( UTC)
|
मोबाइल